Verdict
Sentence was pronounced. The animals in the
herd were sentenced to nine years for sexual abuse and not for rape.
In Spain - just like here in Portugal and in
my country - the police recommend that faced with an assault to steal do not oppose
resistance to the aggressor and the matter will end sooner and better for the
victim, but in the case of a sexual assault it is necessary to fight and risk
the worst because otherwise it is as if you consented to have sex with the
attacker. This is the conclusion that most people got this morning from the
ruling in the trial against la manada
or the wolf pack.
If you are a woman and five ‘wolves’
intimidate you and want to rape you have to face them tooth and nail if not ...
What society are we building where a group
of individuals communicate via social networks the preparations for the great
hunt? Purchase of drugs to stun the victim and live broadcast of a savage of
five horndogs that are not willing to stop an activity that has taken them a
thousand kilometres -for other nearby towns have gone before- to a party where
everything must be allowed.
Leaving aside whether the sentence is proportional
or not, personally what terrifies me is that, on the one hand, honesty was
being judged (even the convicts hired a detective who followed the girl to use
her behaviour after the facts against her) and, on the other hand, the
frivolity and lightness with which today online crimes are propagated that
should hide the aggressors and embarrass us if we see it on our phones.
Knowing that there have been three
magistrates (two men and one woman) who have issued the verdict, I think maybe
the female judge suffered something similar to the girl they introduced in a vestibule
and that the two colleagues intimidated her to such an extent that only saw
sexual abuse and no other crime so that the sentence was softer.
Pity of justice, pity of education.
From my Borstal.
LDR
No comments:
Post a Comment